Study related to the CIPP model as a form of evaluation in training programs

Authors

  • Rahmadani Balai Diklat Keagamaan Ambon, Indonesia

Keywords:

CIPP model, Evaluation, Training

Abstract

The quality of learning in training is inseparable from the training participants and instructor who are implementing the learning program. However, an evaluation is needed as a benchmark for achieving a desired goal. One form of evaluation that is very trending in education is the CIPP (Context-input-process-product) Model developed by Stufflebeam. The results of the literature review show that in applying the evaluation of the CIPP Model at BDK Ambon, the aspect of context or goals are related to the demands of the community or the field, the aspect of input is related to ASN as a learning subject, instructor as a teaching subject, curriculum design as a learning design, media, and infrastructure as teaching aids. While the process or activities of the training participants can learn with direction, assistance, and encouragement from the instructor. And for products or results, it can be seen from the participants when they return to their work units which can be assessed directly by their respective superiors. Thus, the results of the implementation of the CIPP model can be input for superiors in making a policy.

References

Al-Shanawani, H. M. (2019). Evaluation of self-learning curriculum for kindergarten using Stufflebeam’s CIPP Model. SAGE Open, 9(1), 2158244018822380.

A.V. Kelly, The Curriculum: Theory and Practice, (London: SAGE, 2004), hlm. 137

Darma, I. K. (2019). The effectiveness of teaching program of CIPP evaluation model. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT and Scientific Research, 5(3), 1-13.

Daryanto. (2012). Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Farida Yusuf Tayibnapis. (2008). Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi untuk Program Pendidikan dan Penelitian, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Fitri, Agus Zainul. (2013). Manajemen Kurikulum Pendidikan Islam dari Normatif-Filosofis ke Praktis, Bandung: Alfabeta

Gunung, I. N., & Darma, I. K. (2019). Implementing the context, input, process, product (CIPP) evaluation model to measure the effectiveness of the implementation of teaching at Politeknik Negeri Bali (PNB). International Journal of Environmental and Science Education-IJESE, 14(1).

Hamalik, Oemar. (2008). Manajemen Pengembangan Kurikulum, Bandung Remaja Rosda Karya.

Hasan, Hamid. (2009). Evaluasi Kurikulum, Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya

Hasan, A., Yasin, S. N. T. M., & Yunus, M. F. M. (2015). A conceptual framework for mechatronics curriculum using Stufflebeam CIPP Evaluation Model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 844-849.

Neyazi, N., Arab, M., Farzianpour, F., & Majdabadi, M. M. (2016). Evaluation of selected faculties at Tehran University of Medical Sciences using CIPP model in students and graduates point of view. Evaluation and program planning, 59, 88-93

Ngala, J. S., Fongod, G. M., Orock, T. J., Ayuk, B. M., & Njenwi, E. A. (2019). Evaluating distance education programme using Stufflebeam CIPP model: University of Buea Cameroon. Journal of Engineering Research and Application, 9(10-I), 1-15.

Rusman. (2009). Manajemen Kurikulum, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers

Tiantong, M., & Tongchin, P. (2018). A multiple intelligences supported web-based collaborative learning model using Stufflebeam’s CIPP evaluation model. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(7), 157-165.

Wirawan. (2012). Evaluasi: Teori, Model, Standar, Aplikasi, dan Profesi, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-01

How to Cite

Rahmadani. (2022). Study related to the CIPP model as a form of evaluation in training programs . 12 Waiheru, 8(2), 114–123. Retrieved from https://journal.bdkambon-kemenag.id/index.php/12waiheru/article/view/28

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.